Student-Athletes and Profit: Exploring the Challenges of NCAA Business Models

man lying beside on green tennis balls
Photo by Oliver Sjöström on


The NCAA oversees a multi-billion dollar college sports industry while maintaining student-athletes cannot receive pay. This contradictory business model creates inherent tensions and ethical issues. Say’s Jared Kamrass, as revenues grow, the NCAA faces escalating scrutiny around fairness and rights for student-athletes.

Restricting Athlete Payment

NCAA rules strictly limit student-athletes receiving compensation beyond academic scholarships. Paying salaries or endorsements deals would supposedly erode amateurism. However, critics argue these restrictions exploit players who generate huge revenues without receiving direct benefits. Many demand student-athletes get their fair share of the financial pie.

Acquiring an Education

Supporters counter that scholarships facilitating an education are the appropriate reward, not income. Sports should primarily broaden college access. Statistics show college athletes often underperform academically and lack resources. Reform should address subpar graduation rates and academics. Paying salaries would only divert focus further from education.

Time Commitments

Practices, training, film study and travel leave little time for classwork or typical student life. Athletes sacrifice enormously for sports. The NCAA recently began allowing compensation for name, image and likeness rights, but balancing business demands with academics remains a predicament. College sports consume student-athletes.

Health and Safety

Policies inadequately address the physical demands placed on unpaid amateur players. Long-term healthcare is limited for injured athletes. Concussions and chronic injuries create lifelong health issues. Problems like the opioid crisis in football highlight safety failures. The NCAA is working to update healthcare policies but change remains gradual.

Inequities and Racial Issues

Inequities exist across the NCAA’s structure. Predominantly white leadership profits enormously off majority-black football and basketball players. Reform advocates argue letting players share in profits would also address chronic racial injustices. Title IX compliance, women’s sports funding and leadership diversity are also deficient. 

Paths Forward

Allowing endorsement and sponsor deals could offer a fair compromise and revenue stream for athletes. Enhanced academic support services also help balance sports and school. Empowering athletes with collective bargaining rights provides leverage to negotiate protections. There are solutions, but none without tradeoffs.


The NCAA faces growing challenges managing a booming sports business reliant on unpaid talent. While scholarships provide invaluable access, denying athletes fair compensation as leaders profit raises ethical issues. Better supporting student welfare is critical. With nuanced reforms, a model valuing both education and fairness can emerge. There are no easy answers, but progress requires rethinking the system.

Like this article?